Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading wyse. In analytic phonics, we will present students with a word before breaking it down start with the whole and move to the parts during analytic phonics, we will also encourage students to take guesses and use context to guess a word and its phonemes. The boys taught by the synthetic phonics method had better word reading than the girls in their classes, and their spelling and reading comprehension was as good. With phonics generally, children learn to read using the sounds of letters rather than the names. It includes the ability to distinguish rhyme, blend sounds, isolate sounds, segment sounds, and manipulate sounds in words. Analytic phonics instruction, analogybased phonics instruction, and embedded phonics instruction. Whole group phonics phonemic awareness, blending sounds, spelling, sight words. Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading wyse 2008.
Synthetic phonics instruction focuses on teaching each individual letter sound and having kids try to sound each letter or letter combination like th sh one at a time and then try to blend those back into word pronunciations. The differences between analytic and systematic synthetic phonics shows why synthetic phonics is the proven method for teaching reading. The synthetic and analytic methods are traditional approaches, and the analogybased and. Another critical difference is that synthetic phonics teaches children to sound and blend from the start of reading tuition, after the first few letter sounds have been taught.
But there are two main types of phonics analytic and synthetic. Difference between synthetic phonics and analytic phonics phonics is a method which is used for teaching the skill of reading. The first programme for teaching phonics using the analytic phonics method was devised in 1783 by noah webster. In contrast, with analytic phonics teaching, although the boys. At the moment, my criticism of systematic synthetic phonics is not that is. Their progress was tracked until primary seven aged eleven years.
Analytic phonics teaches students to use larger combinations of letters and sounds. However, empirical research has focused on contrasting synthetic phonics teaching with analytic phonics, where words and word parts are taught before individual graphemes. Analytic phonics free download as powerpoint presentation. Synthetic phonics does not teach anything about reading as a meaningfocused process, raising concerns that it addresses part of the reading process only. Longterm effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics. There is a distinctive lack of research and theory into whether the analytical phonics or the synthetic phonics approach would be more effective for the second language learner. We then present the results of the research, analysed according to gender, and discuss the. Therefore a key difference between synthetic and analytic phonics, is that one starts with the smallest unit t a p and teaches children to synthesise letterssounds to read, while the other starts with largest unit tap and teaches children to analyse the word into its constituent letters. Children are taught letter sounds upon starting school, before. Analytic phonics synthetic phonics emphasis on the initial sound, e.
It is most often used in the very early stages of learning to read, before students are able to recognize any words by sight. Synthetic vs analytic phonics difference explained by phonics hero. Ive taught literacy and literacy courses in every grade from kgraduate school. Analytical phonics practitioners do not teach children to pronounce sounds in isolation as is the practice with synthetic phonics, but try to ensure that sounds and letters are taught in meaningful contexts. So, in an analytic approach we will be saying lets look at the word pool. This method differs from the synthetic method as it does not focus on individual letters and sound relationships. Explicit phonics, part of the structured literacy approach, also referred to as synthetic phonics, builds from part to whole.
Stahl 2001 suggests that the links between the childs development of spoken language and the childs subsequent development of literacy are. Next, explicit phonics teaches blending and building, beginning with blending the sounds into syllables and then into. Synthetic phonics is a more accelerated form of phonics. Watson abstract a comparison was made of 10yearold boys and girls who had learnt to read by analytic or synthetic phonics methods as part of their early literacy programmes. In analytic phonics, children at first learn words by sight mostly, having their attention drawn only to the initial letter sounds.
Phonics is a method which is used for teaching the skill of reading. For some children, phonics comes easily and they move into whole word recognition smoothly. Synthetic phonics, also known as blended phonics or inductive phonics, is a method of teaching english reading which first teaches the letter sounds and then builds up to blending these sounds together to achieve full pronunciation of whole words. Despite the differences between both instructions, it is noticed that synthetic phonics is gaining higher popularity and recognition compared to analytic phonics in teaching reading to children. The most significant difference between synthetic and analytic phonics is that synthetic goes from part to whole, while analytic goes from whole to part. Analytic phonics is, in my experience and perhaps in that small effect size difference harder to learn, but it can avoid some of those blending problems and tends to.
According to an ofsted report published in england in 2012, there was a nine percent difference between girls and. Synthetic phonics is a method of teaching where words are broken up. Synthetic phonics refers to a family of programs which aim to teach literacy through the following. The analytic method focuses on learning the onset, or sounds made before the first vowel and the rime, or sound that follows. The importance of systematic phonics instruction in relation to the teaching of reading. Sep 20, 2015 analytic and synthetic phonics duration. The letter groupings in words have patterns and those patterns will often although not always be linked to a particular pattern of phonemes. Defining systematic phonics instruction the differences between analytic and synthetic phonics phonics instruction at your school. What i am saying is that across 38 studies there was no clear difference in effectiveness between synthetic and analytic phonics which angers both some of my phonics fans who are certain that synthetic is best, as well as some of my progressive pals who act as if id squandered the family jewels.
Furthermore, the comparison in the metaanalysis between synthetic and large subunit phonics does not encompass the analytic phonics approach used in the uk for the initial teaching of reading. However, in our view, the evidence is not yet sufficient to conclude that a synthetic phonics approach should be preferred over an analytic one. Analytic phonics vs synthetic phonics phonics reading. May 29, 2011 a comparison was made of 10yearold boys and girls who had learnt to read by analytic or synthetic phonics methods as part of their early literacy programmes. Synthetic phonics is a method of teaching reading that starts with basic letter sounds, blending and sounding out words. Download pdf share on facebook share on twitter share on linkedin. You are teaching phonics, but did you know that not all phonics was created equal. Synthetic phonics instruction focuses on teaching each individual letter sound and having kids try to sound each letter or letter combination like th sh one at a.
Despite this common ground between systematic phonics and synthetic phonics, it is stated that synthetic phonics offers the vast majority of beginners the best route to becoming skilled readers p. Pdf gender differences in early reading strategies a comparison of. There are several things which may impede them from applying what they have been taught. Synthetic or systematic phonics shanahan on literacy. The reason for the claim that analytic phonics was better was it supposedly was showing students a process more like the one that they would actually use to read, and it wasnt messed up by all those extra vowel sounds that synthetic phonics was plagued by it is impossible to pronounce most consonants without adding a vowel, hence the added. Synthetic vs analytic phonics difference explained by.
Bbc news uk education spelling out success in reading. Using the analytic phonics method, children analyze lettersound relationships in words. For others, putting these sounds together is very difficult. Synthetic phonics the heart of synthetic phonics approach is the direct. Embedded phonics is used together with as a side branch of the whole language method of learning to read. The difference between them is substantial enough to affect the gains in literacy that young readers make. And then you and the students will analyze the word. Phonics refers to associating letters or letter groups with the sound they represent. Reading involves breaking words into separate sounds and blending them together to read the word. After having discounted analytical phonics as a possible primary approach to reading instruction for second language learners, we are left with synthetic phonics.
Ronato, a master of arts in education major in english student at the university of the cordilleras on august 1, 20 thursday. Phonics difference between descriptive analysis and. However, we also propose that teachers be given the training to use analytic phonics when, after reasonable attempts of using direct instruction, the synthetic phonics approach fails. Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading wiley online library. In analytic phonics, children are taught whole words and later analyse their constituent parts, such as cat or street. With analytic phonics, children are taught to recognize whole words by sight, and later to break down the word into the smaller units of sound. As far as differences between analytic and synthetic phonics programmes. By these organisations, and for this study, synthetic phonics adapts wholeheartedly the simple view of reading, i. Someone on the reading reform foundation website recently asked what were the differences between linguistic and synthetic phonics.
It begins with the instruction of the letters graphemes with their associated sounds phonemes. Definitions and examples are given for each method, and the different strategies are compared to each other. However, many schools are still teaching analytic phonics. I take the view that synthetic phonics taught directly and systematically is essential to any literacy program. Synthetic phonics and analytic phonics are the flip side of each other and they reinforce each other. It describes an association between letters in the alphabets and the sounds used in our spoken languages. This method has children analysing a word taking clues from the shape of the word, the initial. Synthetic phonics instruction focuses on teaching each individual letter sound and having kids try to sound each letter or letter combination like th, sh one at a time and then try to blend those back into word pronunciations. This essay discusses three alternatives to synthetic phonics instruction.
Examining the evidence on the effectiveness of synthetic. What is the difference between systematic and synthetic. Traditionally, children were taught to read using analytic phonics. Despite claims to the contrary, research doesnt find that one is better than the.
A comparative study of two methods of synthetic phonics instruction for learning how to read. This method has children analysing a word, taking clues from recognition of the whole word, the initial sound and the context. Torgerson et al 2006 metaanalysis shows evidence of multiple errors in the selection of the studies to be included and. Pdf about this topic that covers more than just analytic and synthetic. As far as differences between analytic and synthetic phonics programmes were concerned, the nrp concluded that specific systematic phonics programs are all significantly more effective than non. So usually, we come across a word incidentally in the text and we look at the whole word. In contrast, with analytic phonics teaching, although the boys performed. With analytic phonics, children are taught to recognize whole words by. Analytic phonics vs synthetic phonics get reading right. Analytical phonics refers to an approach to the teaching of reading in which the phonemes associated with particular graphemes are not pronounced in isolation. Englishspeaking government inquiries all concluded that your phonics teaching should be explicit and systematic known as synthetic phonics approach. Explicit or synthetic phonics teaches the alphabet, starting with the most regular associations between letter and sound eg, the these include synthetic phonics, analytic phonics, embedded distinctions between systematic phonics approaches are explained by differences between.
Rose wrote, analytic phonics is good, but synthetic phonics is better p. This is a hit and miss approach which encouraged guessing as a first reading strategy. Furthermore, consonant blends separate, adjacent consonant phonemes are taught as units e. Synthetic phonics can be a bit easier to catch onto, but its effectiveness can be undermined by blending problems and some of the analytic approaches can help with that. In this paper we contrast two commercially available. This is probably the least effective way to teach reading in the above 4 listed strategies. Overall, the group taught by synthetic phonics had better word reading, spelling, and. There were no significant differences between different approaches to teaching phonics synthetic, phonogrambased, or eclectic. Synthetic phonics analytic phonics control synthetic phonics group had higher reading ages, outperformed the analytic and the control groups in letter sound knowledge, nonword reading, spelling, phoneme segmentation and cue word reading. For example, teacher and pupils discuss how the following words are alike.
Analytic vs systematic synthetic phonics get reading right. Longterm effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls rhona s. Reading and spelling gains with systematic synthetic phonics. Children identify analyze the common phoneme in a set of words in which each word contains the phoneme under study. Synthetic phonics for reading and spelling phonics hero. The student cannot hear the difference between similarsounding phonemes. I like to go back and forth between synthetic phonics play and analytic phonics play to keep things more interesting and to make sure my learner is able to do both processes nimbly and reliably. Analytic and synthetic phonics inspired education services. This method of teaching phonics is the most widely used in the usa today. Longterm effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls article pdf available in reading and writing 256 july 2011. A comparative study of two methods of synthetic phonics.
This rule works for each phoneme, in every position is importance of short words but is problematic for important. Analytic phonics for writing similarly relies on inferential learning. Today i want to talk to you about the differences between analytic and synthetic phonics. Synthetic phonics teaches phonics at the level of the individual phoneme from the outset. Children are taught to analyze lettersound relationships and look to decode words based upon spelling and letter patterns and their sounds. Stahl 2001 suggests that the links between the childs development of spoken language and the childs subsequent development of literacy are becoming increasingly well understood. Analytic phonics definition and meaning collins english. Probably the two major ones are synthetic and analytic phonics.
It became the best selling reading programme for nearly 100 years. Linguistic versus synthetic phonics the literacy blog. This chapter excerpt provides a brief overview of synthetic and analytic approaches to phonics instruction. Dec 17, 2011 although some people claim that the differences between linguistic phonics and synthetic phonics are minimal, i would contend that they are enormous and, furthermore, that these differences have profound consequences for teaching and learning. Analytical phonics also known as analytic phonics uses the analysis of word forms to structure phonic instruction. Different types of phonics strategies for teaching. The analytic phonics method teaches children the phonic relationships among words. This is a method of teaching reading and spelling through decoding and encoding with a systematic approach. Analytic phonics is the process of going from the whole to the part. Pdf longterm effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics. It is the synthesising, or blending of phonemes sounds to make a word, enabling children to read. Difference between synthetic phonics and analytic phonics. Gender differences in early reading strategies a comparison of.
Synthetic phonics instruction focuses on teaching each individual letter. There were no significant differences between different approaches to teaching phonicssynthetic, phonogrambased, or eclectic. The analytical phonics approach is often referred to as the whole word approach, which relies upon children. One of the differences between the systems is that in analytic phonics, children analyse letters sounds after the word has been identified. Synthetic phonics on the other hand, involves no guessing. The differences between analytic and synthetic phonics.
This differs from whole language or analytical phonics methods, which emphasize sight words and book reading over sounding out words. Analytic vs synthetic phonics ppt video online download. Pdf a comparison was made of 10yearold boys and girls who had learnt to read by analytic or synthetic phonics methods as part of their early. Although some people claim that the differences between linguistic phonics and synthetic phonics are minimal, i would contend that they are enormous and, furthermore, that these differences have profound consequences for teaching and learning. A comparison was made of 10yearold boys and girls who had learnt to read by analytic or synthetic phonics methods as part of their early literacy programmes. It highlights decoding and pronunciation of words only.
165 122 14 357 1108 776 1562 1015 197 1221 83 1391 637 187 1207 1192 659 1050 1326 855 1139 316 740 980 267 666 1356 545 909 328 1491 1299